Media Literacy — 42 Techniques

✦ ✦

This resource expands the principles of Fred's Charter into a practical field guide. These 42 techniques describe how framing, selection, and structure shape information — sometimes deliberately, sometimes as a product of institutional habit. Recognising them is the first step to reading past them.

Techniques

I · Language & Framing

Loaded Language

"Regime" not "government." "Terrorist" not "militant." The word chosen carries a verdict before any evidence is presented.

Euphemism

"Collateral damage" for civilian deaths. "Enhanced interrogation" for torture. Neutral language softens reality.

Weasel Words

"Some say," "sources claim" — with no sources named, no accountability taken, and no way to evaluate the claim.

Passive Voice to Erase Agency

"Mistakes were made." "People were killed." The passive construction removes the actor from the sentence entirely.

Scare Quotes

Placing a word in quotation marks to cast doubt without argument. A "ceasefire." The "victims." The "evidence."

Colloquial Nitpicking

Applying strict technical definitions to ordinary speech to manufacture inaccuracy. If the core assertion is directionally correct, imprecision is not a material error.

II · Selection & Omission

Selective Omission

Telling part of the truth while leaving out the part that changes its meaning entirely. The omission is invisible — it leaves no trace.

Burying the Lead

Placing the most significant fact at the end of an article, after most readers have stopped reading.

Cherry-Picking Data

Choosing only the statistics, time periods, or studies that support a predetermined conclusion while ignoring those that contradict it.

Missing Context

Reporting an event without the historical or political background that explains why it happened and what it means.

Coverage Gaps

Systematically ignoring events affecting certain populations. Absence of coverage is an editorial choice, not evidence of absence.

Source Gatekeeping

Quoting only official voices while excluding affected communities, dissidents, and opposing experts from the record.

III · Source Credibility

Appeal to Authority Without Scrutiny

Treating government or institutional statements as facts requiring no corroboration. Institutional sources are sources like any other.

Asymmetric Scepticism

Demanding rigorous proof from one side while accepting the other's claims at face value. The standard of evidence shifts depending on who is speaking.

Delegitimising by Association

Dismissing a claim because of who made it, rather than evaluating the evidence itself.

Geographic Source Hierarchy

Treating Western outlet coverage as confirmation and non-Western sources as needing Western validation. African, Asian, and Middle Eastern sources are primary sources.

Anonymous Sourcing Without Accountability

"Officials familiar with the matter." No name, no institution, no way to assess motive or reliability.

Expert Laundering

Presenting think tanks, lobby-funded researchers, or conflicted academics as independent experts without disclosing affiliations or funding.

IV · Narrative & Agenda-Setting

False Balance

Presenting fringe positions as equivalent to scientific consensus. Equal airtime does not mean equal evidence.

False Dichotomy

Reducing complex issues to two options and erasing every alternative. "You're either with us or against us" is the extreme form.

Protagonist / Antagonist Framing

Casting allied states as inherently defensive and designated adversaries as inherently aggressive, regardless of the specific evidence for any specific act.

Agenda-Setting Through Repetition

Hammering certain stories relentlessly while ignoring others of equal importance. What gets covered most is perceived as most significant.

Manufacturing Consensus

"Everyone agrees," "no serious person doubts" — language that creates the impression of agreement when genuine disagreement exists.

Importing Unrelated Background

Weakening a specific factual claim by surrounding it with context designed to discredit the person making it rather than the claim itself.

V · Suppression & Dismissal

Label-Based Pre-Dismissal

Calling something a "conspiracy theory" or "disinformation" as a substitute for examining its evidence. The label replaces the argument.

Institutional Silence as Corroboration

Treating absence of official denial, or absence of media coverage, as evidence that an allegation is false. Silence proves nothing either way.

Cover-Up Dismissal

Treating suppression of inconvenient information as implausible by default. Elite suppression of inconvenient truths is historically well-documented.

Ridicule as Rebuttal

Mocking a claim or its proponents instead of addressing the substance. If something sounds absurd, the instinct is to laugh rather than examine.

Chilling Language

Describing truthful speech as "dangerous" or "destabilising" to discourage publication, sharing, or further investigation.

VI · Statistical & Visual Distortion

Misleading Headlines

A headline claiming something the article itself does not support. Most readers never reach the correction buried within.

Manipulated Charts

Truncated axes, selective time periods, or misleading scales that make small changes look dramatic or large changes look trivial.

Absolute vs Relative Risk Confusion

"Doubles your risk" sounds alarming. "Increases risk from 1-in-a-million to 2-in-a-million" does not. Both statements can describe the same finding.

Correlation Presented as Causation

Two things happening together reported as one causing the other. A relationship between variables is not an explanation of them.

Selective Casualty Accounting

Applying rigorous scrutiny to one side's casualty figures while accepting the other side's uncritically. The standard of verification shifts by actor.

Decontextualised Images or Footage

Using real photographs or video from a different time, place, or conflict to illustrate a current event. The images are genuine; the context is not.

VII · Structural & Institutional Bias

Editorial Dependence on Advertisers

Avoiding stories that might displease major commercial partners or government funders. The editorial decision is never recorded; the story simply does not run.

Revolving-Door Commentary

Presenting former officials, military officers, or lobbyists as independent analysts without disclosing their prior roles or ongoing interests.

Access Journalism

Softening coverage of powerful figures to preserve privileged access. The trade is honesty for proximity, and it is rarely made explicit.

Both-Sidesing Structural Inequality

Treating the powerful and the powerless as equivalent parties in a dispute in order to appear neutral. Balance and equivalence are not the same thing.

Algorithmic Amplification of Bias

AI and algorithmic systems trained on skewed media corpora inherit and amplify existing biases at scale, creating feedback loops that are harder to see than individual editorial decisions.

Self-Censorship Under Political Pressure

Newsrooms quietly dropping stories not because they are untrue but because they are inconvenient to the powerful. The decision leaves no public trace.

Default Cultural Assumptions

Training data and editorial culture embed certain geographic and cultural perspectives as the neutral default — shaping which stories are told, how, and for whom.

Fact-check on WhatsApp

+44 7863 795638

Fact-check on Web

fredcheck.com

Contact

hello@fredcheck.com